Our recommendations are made independently through Research & Testing. We may receive commissions from purchases made via our links.
Evergrind E202 1/2 HP vs InSinkErator Evolution Compact 3/4 HP Garbage Disposal Side-by-Side Comparison
InSinkErator Evolution Compact 3/4 HP vs Emerson Evergrind E202 1/2 HP Garbage Disposal: A win by default, so to speak.
Evergrind E202 1/2 HP Garbage Disposal
Tested Using Methodology v1.0InSinkErator Evolution Compact
Tested Using Methodology v1.0
Overall Verdict
The Emerson Evergrind E202 1/2 HP simply cannot compete with the likes of the InSinkErator Evolution Compact 3/4 HP. It’s not just because they have different power ratings, but also because the Evergrind E202 is one of the worst garbage disposals we’ve ever tested. That’s why even though the InSinkErator Compact costs a lot more money, it’s much more cost-effective in comparison.
Out of the seven 3/4-hp garbage disposals in our lineup, the Evolution Compact is not the best performing one; per our data from performance testing, it only ranks 4th (6th out of 20 products, overall). This mainly reflects the disposal’s consistent but average grinding capability, which means there are better grinders. What stands out about the Evolution Compact is how quiet it is during operation. In fact, the noise-damping features in the InSinkErator Evolution series are currently unmatched on the market.
The Evergrind E202, on the other hand, is as basic as it gets. It features no soundproofing and doesn’t look fancy. But we would happily look past that if the disposal hadn’t delivered such abysmal results in its evaluation. Not only did it not pass the standard test (random food scraps), it overheated a couple of times. So when it was time for the challenge tests (raw meat scraps), the disposal understandably failed.
In any circumstance, we do not recommend the Emerson Evergrind E202 1/2 HP due to how badly its motor may work; it’s an unnecessary inconvenience in the kitchen. By contrast, the InSinkErator Evolution Compact 3/4 HP is a reliable piece of equipment. It may be pricey, but it’s for your peace of mind.
Pros & Cons
- High capacity
- Compact design
- External unjam mechanics
- Noise cancelation
- Vibration damping
- High-torque motor
- Strengthened chamber layout
- High capacity
- Stainless steel grinding components
- Subpar performance
- Heavy build
- Non-removable splash guard
- Loud operation
- Heavy
- Space-consuming
- No power cord
Key Specs
Where to Buy
*You help support HealthyKitchen101's product testing and reviews by purchasing from our retail partners.
Analysis and Test Results
Performance
Scrap Mix
Raw Fish Scraps
Raw Chicken Scraps
Design
In the Box
Dimensions
Mount Assembly
Grind Chamber
Motor
Power Cord
Accessories
Build Quality
Usability
Ease of Use
Installation
Smooth Operation
Unjam Mechanics
Behind the Comparison
Be Nguyen is a writer and product reviewer. Being naturally curious about technology and its real-world applications, Be spent several years in university studying engineering before joining the team at HealthyKitchen101 where he disassembles, tests, and rates household appliances.
Lap is Head of the Research, Testing, and Review Team (RTR Team) at HealthyKitchen101.com, where he directs and supervises the testing of kitchen gadgets and appliances.
Nguyen Ntk is a graphic designer, photographer, and videographer whose philosophy centers around respecting and celebrating the beauty of reality. Through his lenses, Nguyen strives to capture the true essence of objects and events, showcasing and highlighting authentic features without distortion or exaggeration.
