Our recommendations are made independently through Research & Testing. We may receive commissions from purchases made via our links.

KitchenIQ 50009 vs. Zwilling 4-Stage Manual Sharpener Side-by-Side Comparison

KitchenIQ 50009 vs. Zwilling 4-stage Sharpener. Check how they compare in performance, ease of use, and design.

Updated
KitchenIQ 50009 vs. Zwilling 4-Stage Manual Sharpener: A Comparison of Two Mediocrities

Specifications

Price at publication
$10.67$29.53
Stages
22
Scissor sharpener
NoNo
Abrasives
Tungsten carbide, ceramicCeramic discs
Grit size
Coarse, FineCoarse, Fine
Dimensions
L3.7 x W2.1 x H1.8 inchesL9.3 x W1.7 x H3.1 inches

Design

Build Quality
Grip
Overall Design Scoring

Other than the inadequate size, there’s nothing to complain about in the design of the KitchenIQ. The device is symmetrical, sturdy, and has a decent fit and finish. It’s smart, simple, versatile, and highly function-oriented.

The Zwilling sharpener has a robust construction; its frame is made with mostly high-quality materials and has an excellent fit and finish. Its most important components—the sharpening blades—however, seem to be made of the wrong material for the job. The tall, long, but narrow body, meanwhile, makes it more prone to losing balance and stability.

Usability

Slot Arrangement
Insertion
Pulling Through
Stability on a Clean Surface
Stability on a Wet and Dirty Surface
Overall Usability Scoring

With only two sharpening slots and a basic design, it doesn’t require a high IQ to understand how the KitchenIQ works. The device’s small size may, however, mean you have to pay extra attention every time you use it or risk hurting yourself by misplacing the knife.

Though the Zwilling’s slot layout is not exactly basic, it’s easy to work with. Blade insertion is safe and simple. However, the actual sharpening process can be a little challenging as the device tends to rock on its narrow base pad.

Performance

Sharpening Time to Cut a Lemon
Maximum Sharpness Achieved
Edge Smoothness
Material Retention
Overall Performance Scoring

The KitchenIQ failed the speed test and offered mediocre results in all other performance tests. Its rather small sharpening elements will sharpen your knives enough that you’ll be able to feel the difference, but not significantly. It will shave a lot of metal off your knives and leave a barely passable edge.

The Zwilling isn’t a complete failure: It can sharpen a dead, dull knife to highly serviceable keenness. However, it lost way too many points on speed, which is a critical criterion for convenient sharpeners. Its sharpening blades left a consistent edge, but that doesn’t make up for the excessive amount of material it removed doing so. It reminded us of the Chef’s Choice 4643 in many ways.

Overall Scores

Performance
Design
Ease of Use
Overall Scoring

Pros & Cons

  • Easy storage
  • Affordable price 
  • Base works on both counter edge and flat surfaces 
  • Simple, sturdy design
  • Substantial weight
  • Sharpens both Asian and standard knives
  • Strong build, high-quality body material
  • Slot cover 
  • Beautiful design
  • Awkward small size
  • Long sharpening time
  • Brittle sharpening blades 
  • Anti-slip pad doesn’t fully cover the base
  • Awkward grip

Conclusion

The KitchenIQ 50009 2-stage and the Zwilling 4-stage manual sharpeners have a lot more in common than their looks and prices may suggest.

Though distinctive in size, the two sharpeners share a strong, solid, sturdy build. Each has unique selling points: The former sports a compact size and an edge-gripping base, while the latter sharpens and hones at two different grind angles. 

Unfortunately, neither performed particularly well in our tests. In fact, they were among the slowest and least effective sharpeners. The Zwilling did slightly better in most categories but that didn’t offer much of a consolation, especially considering its high price. 

There are plenty of other manual pull-through sharpeners that can do a better job. Check out our rating tables to find the right one for you.

Behind the Comparison

Headshot of Anh Ngo
Anh NgoReviewer

Anh Ngo is a writer with 9 years experience at different media outlets, covering from public news and events to product testing and analysis. At HealthyKitchen101, she works across different departments, communicating closely with its network of writers, editors, and health, tech, and search engine experts to provide a meaningful and pleasant reading experience for visitors.

Headshot of Lap Vo
Lap VoTest Lead

Lap is Head of the Research, Testing, and Review Team (RTR Team) at HealthyKitchen101.com, where he directs and supervises the testing of kitchen gadgets and appliances.

Related Comparisons