Our recommendations are made independently through Research & Testing. We may receive commissions from purchases made via our links.

Scrap Mix for Garbage Disposals

Let’s see how well garbage disposals can grind down a mixture of random scraps from stringy veggies to tough animal bones compared to one another.

By , , and ·Updated

This test is part of How We Test Garbage Disposals v1.0

The point of an in-sink garbage disposal is to swallow everything, grind it up so it won’t clog the plumbing, and leave behind nothing. In this particular test, we aim to answer one question: how well do these disposals handle a mixed range of food scraps?

Why Scrap Mix Matters

From the moment of their invention, garbage disposals have always faced off against big loads of waste material that threaten to clog the works.

Pushing food down the drain is problematic, to say the least, without a good disposal system. They help pulverize leftovers before any of them hit the pipes and significantly reduce the risk of blockage. At least, that is what we are told.

In this particular test, we aim to showcase what comes out of a food disposer after it swallows significant amounts of kitchen scraps in order to put each model’s performance into perspective.

The evidence we collect, categorize, and document by going under the sink, and into the grind chambers, helps bring light to normally covert issues. A clear example of said issues is how some of the fish bones are able to slide through certain models nearly intact.

Additionally, the test highlights capacity issues behind these disposals, especially in the case of weaker models. In our early tests, the volume of input materials had a drastic impact on the outcome. A little trial and error helped the team drill down to the apparent limits and we updated our methods accordingly.

Test Procedure

Preparation

To conduct the test, we first have to prepare some equipment and the appropriate mix of scraps. Some of the important items are hard to find, but it’s all worth the effort in the end. We also partner with local businesses to use their avocado scraps as well as thrown-away corn cobs and eggshells so we don’t have to waste much food.

Something else to note here is that the fish and chicken bones in this particular test are all cooked. We save the raw stuff for other tests.

List of equipment:

  • Scale
  • Scraps tray
  • Timer
  • Sound level meter
  • Rubber cleaning gloves
  • Running water
  • Drain baffle
  • Garbage disposal
  • (Layer 1) Shallow 18½-inch plastic colander with round holes (~ 0.08 sq in)
  • (Layer 2) Deep 18½-inch plastic colander with rounded square holes (~ 0.05 sq in)
  • Deep 20-inch water container

We stack the shallow and deep colanders to create a two-layer screening device, with Layer 1 on top catching large pieces and Layer 2 below catching smaller pieces. The two layers with different openings help us categorize the output into two groups which we will measure in step 3 of the test.

List of Ingredients:

Various food scraps in plastic bags and on metal tray, prepared for performance reviewing of best garbage disposals, displayed on white top.
Food scraps prepared for the test.
  • Total weight: ~ 90 oz (2535-2590 g)* 
  1. Eggshells: ~ 1.4 oz (35-40 g)
  2. Apples slices: ~ 8.8 oz (245-250 g)
  3. Squeezed oranges: ~ 10.5 oz (295-300 g)
  4. Lemons: ~ 10.5 oz (295-300 g)
  5. Potatoes: ~ 12.3 oz (345-350 g)
  6. Celery: ~ 8.9 oz (250-255 g)
  7. Avocado pits: ~ 2.8 oz (75-80 g)
  8. Avocado peels: ~ 2.8 oz (75-80 g)
  9. Corn cobs: ~ 5.2 oz (145-150 g)
  10. Cooked chicken bones: ~ 3.1 oz (85-90 g)
  11. Cooked fish bones: ~ 24.6 oz (690-700 g)

*The figures shown are for one run.

Having calculated an agreeable value range, we weigh everything, from the eggshells to the fish bones. We next add them up to a final sum so we can conveniently compare different loads later on. The intention is to make sure that all candidates receive their fair share of work and minimize the margin of error.

Execution

  • Step 1: With the drain baffle in position, we throw the prepared scraps in the sink and mix them up the best we can. We also break up some of the big chunks of fish bones during this stage. Next, we remove the baffle* when possible, place the screener in position and move on to the next step.

*Removing the baffle makes it easier to herd scraps down the drain.

  • Step 2: We put on running water, turn on the machine, start the timer and the noise level meter, and proceed to flush stuff down. Each candidate will operate for no longer than 4 minutes or until the majority of the input load has been processed* with the materials going in continuously.

*When we can’t remove the baffle to visually judge the progress, we listen to the noise.

During this stage, we avoid forcing food down the drain when possible. The disposal should be doing the work, after all. We only intervene if scraps appear stuck. We pause when a disposal jams to unjam its motor or when a disposal overheats to wait for the circuit breaker to reset, then continue the test until the time is up or the candidate has overheated 3 times.

  • Step 3: After turning the machine off, we collect the scraps that have accumulated on each layer of our device, dry everything, and weigh each category of materials respectively. Then, we gather all remaining scraps, i.e. the leftovers inside the grinding chamber, and weigh that as well. We call these leftovers Layer 3.

Scoring 

The test focuses on how good and how fast garbage disposals are at grinding down garbage so that everything travels through the drain pipes without causing clogs. One very effective way to predict such clogs is by evaluating the size of scraps that every machine produces. 

Based on the amounts of leftovers, the processing times, and the weights of Layer 1 (large pieces) and Layer 2 (small pieces), we begin scoring the products.

We set the Pass/Fail criteria as follows:

  • If a candidate has overheated three times, the run fails.
  • If the leftovers are more than 1% of input load after 4 minutes, the run fails.

The input load is decidedly fixed at 90 ounces, so if a candidate leaves behind less than 0.9 ounces, it will pass.

Time, in turn, is scored as follows:

  • A candidate scores a 10 if it finishes (less than 0.9 ounces of leftovers) under 2 minutes.
  • For every 7 seconds beyond, a candidate loses 0.5 point.

Because herding the mix down the drain already takes 1 minute 15 seconds or so, with the average time across all runs also considered, we feel that 2 minutes is the appropriate time mark to start scoring.

Next, Layer 1 and 2 are scored: 

  • If Layer 1 catches less than 1% of the input load, it receives 10 points. For every 2% beyond, it loses 1 point.
  • If Layer 2 catches less than 5% of the input load, it receives 10 points. For every 4%, it loses 1 point.

In other words, a model gets a perfect score if, in under 2 minutes, less than 0.9 ounces of the ground materials are caught by the first colander and no more than 4.5 ounces worth are caught by the second. The more chunky bits that come out, the less effective the garbage disposal.

A product’s final rating for the Scrap Mix Test takes the scoring of Time, Layer 1, and Layer 2 into account. Time is allocated 40% for its importance; Layer 1 and Layer 2 takes 35% and 25% respectively, with Layer 1 claims the majority for its theoretical impact on the drains.

Examples

Let’s take a look at some of the results we collected:

  • Insinkerator Evolution Excel: 9.8 points.
0.29 ounces of ground products from garbage disposal, displayed on digital scale, placed on granite-looking table. Broken up pieces of corncob.
Leftovers weighed 0.29 ounces, meeting the criteria.
0.66 ounces of ground products from garbage disposal, displayed on digital scale, placed on granite-looking table. Visible fish pin bones in mess of assorted scraps.
Layer 1 weighed 0.66 ounces, receiving 10 points.
7.16 ounces of ground products from garbage disposal, displayed on digital scale, placed on granite-looking table. Mess of assorted scraps, including dietary fibers, shredded bones, etc.
Layer 2 weighed 7.16 ounces, receiving 9.3 points.

Finishing time is at 1 minute 58 seconds, receiving 10 points. The final rating of 9.8 draws 3.5 points from Layer 1, 2.3 points from Layer 2, and 4 points from Time.

  • GE Disposall Green Disposer: 6.6 points.
0.06 ounces of ground products from garbage disposal, displayed on digital scale, placed on granite-looking top. Pieces of shredded fish backbone and few pieces of fish bone.
Leftovers weighed 0.06 ounces, meeting the criteria.
12.34 ounces of ground products from garbage disposal, displayed on digital scale, placed on granite-looking top. Visible fish pin bones in mess of assorted scraps, including dietary fiber, shredded bones, etc.
Layer 1 weighed 12.34 ounces receiving 3.6 points.
15.48 ounces of ground products from garbage disposal, displayed on digital scale, placed on granite-looking top. Visible fish pin bones in mess of assorted scraps, including dietary fiber, shredded bones, etc.
Layer 2 weighed 15.48 ounces, receiving 7 points.

Finishing time is at 2 minutes 13 seconds, receiving 9 points. The final rating of 6.6 draws 1.3 points from Layer 1, 1.7 points from Layer 2, and 3.6 from Time.

Test Developers

Headshot of Be Nguyen
Be NguyenReviewer

Be Nguyen is a writer and product reviewer. Being naturally curious about technology and its real-world applications, Be spent several years in university studying engineering before joining the team at HealthyKitchen101 where he disassembles, tests, and rates household appliances.

Headshot of Lap Vo
Lap VoTest Lead

Lap is Head of the Research, Testing, and Review Team (RTR Team) at HealthyKitchen101.com, where he directs and supervises the testing of kitchen gadgets and appliances.

Headshot of Nguyen Ntk
Nguyen NtkVisual Specialist

Nguyen Ntk is a graphic designer, photographer, and videographer whose philosophy centers around respecting and celebrating the beauty of reality. Through his lenses, Nguyen strives to capture the true essence of objects and events, showcasing and highlighting authentic features without distortion or exaggeration.

Related Tests